Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 8 - Jul 13
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
hs7007 c t p4s ul fagTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0191840930000 Auendurchmesser: 62 mm Gewicht: 157 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmierffnung Spannung: geringe Spannung Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 62,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 14,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 14,00 C 15 Contact Angle ECLASS number 23 05 08 03 ECLASS2 number 23 05 08 03 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0. 17 Innenmae: mm
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 0191840930000 |
| Außendurchmesser: 62 mm |
| Gewicht: 157 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmieröffnung |
| Spannung: geringe Spannung |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 62,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 14,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 14,00 |
| C 15° Contact Angle |
| ECLASS number 23-05-08-03 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-08-03 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.17 |
| Innenmaße: mm 35,00 |
| P4S Boundary Dimensions ISO 4, Abec-7, Running Accuracy ISO 2, Abec-9 |
| Paarung G – Universelle Paarung |
| Präzision P4S Präzision (Höher als P4) |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 8900 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 5000 |
| T Textile Laminated Phenolic Resin, Outer Ring Guided. The Cage Is Suitable For Long-Term Operation At Temperatures Up To 100°C |
| UL Single Bearing, Universal, Light Preload |
| Abhebekraft leicht: 94 N |
| Abhebekraft schwer: 614 N |
| Abstand Druckkegelspitze: 13,5 mm |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung: h12 |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 41 mm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit leicht: 27,1 N/µm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit schwer: 58,8 N/µm |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 100 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 5.000 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r 8.900 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 530 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| D 62 mm Außendurchmesser |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 8.900 N |
| E tk max 46,8 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk min 45,7 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 max 46,8 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 min 43,9 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 530 N |
| F V H 187 N Vorspannkraft schwer |
| F V L 31 N Vorspannkraft leicht |
| K aE H 614 N Abhebekraft schwer |
| K aE L 94 N Abhebekraft leicht |
| Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis: 46,8 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 0,3 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 1 mm |
| Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis: 43,9 mm |
| Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis: 45,7 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 1 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 5.000 N |
| T max 100 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| Vorspannkraft leicht: 31 N |
| Vorspannkraft schwer: 187 N |
| a 13,5 mm Abstand Druckkegelspitze |
| c a H 58,8 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit schwer |
| c a L 27,1 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit leicht |
| d =a 41 mm Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =a h12 Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung |
| r 1 min 1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| r a max 1 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r a1 max 0,3 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 0,156 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 767 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Good buy
Love these. Easy clean up and use. As described
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 7, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Value, Durability, Everyday Use
What I liked:
- Price-to-value is the standout. These were significantly better priced than similar packs I’ve bought from local grocery stores and big discount retailers.
- For everyday, disposable use—think casseroles, baked pasta, brownies, roasted veggies—the lighter weight is perfectly fine.
- They stack neatly and are easy to store, which matters when you’re buying in bulk.
What I didn’t like:
- They’re a bit flimsier and not as thick as the store-brand pans I’ve used before. You can feel the difference when you handle them.
- For heavier dishes (large lasagnas, big roasts, or anything dense with sauces), a single pan can flex more than I’d like.
How I used them:
- Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve used these for baking brownies, roasting chicken thighs with vegetables, and prepping freezer meals. When I expected more weight or lots of liquid, I doubled up the pans, which solved the flex issue and kept everything stable.
- I also tested bending one to compare sturdiness. In the accompanying video, you’ll see me gently flexing the pan to show the “give.” In the photo, I placed this pan next to a thicker pan I bought at a regular store so you can see the difference in gauge.
My takeaway:
- If you need heavy-duty pans for very weighty dishes, these aren’t a perfect one-for-one replacement for thicker, premium options. However, for routine baking, storage, and serving—especially when you plan to toss the pan afterward—the cost savings make a lot of sense.
- Doubling them for heavier recipes is a simple workaround that maintains stability while still keeping the overall cost lower than buying thicker single-use pans.
Verdict:
- I’ll be purchasing these again for everyday use and bulk meal prep. The value is strong, and the performance is solid when you match the pan to the job or double up as needed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 15, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Easy clean up
Sturdy. Various uses.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 7, 2026
★★★★★ 5
pans
good
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 31, 2026
★★★★★ 2
Terrible!!
VERY lightweight and flimsy. I wouldn't trust these pans with anything! Oh... they might be okay for serving potato chips or popcorn.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 24, 2026