Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 8 - Jul 13
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
FY17 TF SKFTechnische Basisdaten Ermdungsgrenzbelastung: 0. 2 kN Gewicht: 395 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 9 500 r min Hersteller: SKF Stellschraube: G2: M6x0. 75 Zweckspezifisch: Fr Frdertechnikanwendungen Erweiterte technische Daten 1 4 28 SAE LT: Gewinde des Schmiernippels 11. 5 mm Durchmesser Fuschraubenloch 14. 5 mm Axialer Offset der Spannstifte 26 mm Gesamtueres Breitenma 3. 2 mm Tiefe der Zentriereindrehung 32. 9 mm Gesamtueres Breitenma der Einheit 4 mm
Technische Basisdaten
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung: 0.2 kN |
| Gewicht: 395 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 9 500 r/min |
| Hersteller: SKF |
| Stellschraube: G2: M6x0.75 |
| Zweckspezifisch: Für Fördertechnikanwendungen |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| 1/4-28 SAE-LT: Gewinde des Schmiernippels |
| 11.5 mm Durchmesser Fußschraubenloch |
| 14.5 mm Axialer Offset der Spannstifte |
| 26 mm GesamtÄußeres Breitenmaß |
| 3.2 mm Tiefe der Zentriereindrehung |
| 32.9 mm GesamtÄußeres Breitenmaß der Einheit |
| 4 mm Empfohlener Durchmesser für Spannstifte |
| 53 mm Unterer Außendurchmesser |
| 6.5 mm Durchmesser der Kopfbereichs des Schmiernippels |
| 66 mm Abstand der Spannstifte |
| 7 mm Schlüsselweite für Schmiernippel |
| 76 mm Gesamtlänge |
| Abdichtung:, Einheit Ohne |
| Art der Abdichtung: Contact, standard |
| Beschichtung Ohne |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß, gesamt 32.9 mm |
| Dynamische Tragzahl 9.56 kN |
| Dynamische Tragzahl: 9.56 kN |
| Einhaltung der Norm: ISO |
| Einlagering Ohne |
| Einzelgewicht 0.373 kg |
| Flanschlagergehäusetyp Vierkant |
| Grenzdrehzahl 9 500 r/min |
| Mittenabstand zwischen Bolzenlöchern 54 mm |
| Nachschmierbohrung Für |
| Schmiernippel Für |
| Schmierstoff: Fett |
| Statische Tragzahl 4.75 kN |
| Statische Tragzahl: 4.75 kN |
| UNSPSC-Code 31171536 |
| eClass-Code 23-05-08-02 |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 1977 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Good buy
Love these. Easy clean up and use. As described
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 7, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Value, Durability, Everyday Use
What I liked:
- Price-to-value is the standout. These were significantly better priced than similar packs I’ve bought from local grocery stores and big discount retailers.
- For everyday, disposable use—think casseroles, baked pasta, brownies, roasted veggies—the lighter weight is perfectly fine.
- They stack neatly and are easy to store, which matters when you’re buying in bulk.
What I didn’t like:
- They’re a bit flimsier and not as thick as the store-brand pans I’ve used before. You can feel the difference when you handle them.
- For heavier dishes (large lasagnas, big roasts, or anything dense with sauces), a single pan can flex more than I’d like.
How I used them:
- Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve used these for baking brownies, roasting chicken thighs with vegetables, and prepping freezer meals. When I expected more weight or lots of liquid, I doubled up the pans, which solved the flex issue and kept everything stable.
- I also tested bending one to compare sturdiness. In the accompanying video, you’ll see me gently flexing the pan to show the “give.” In the photo, I placed this pan next to a thicker pan I bought at a regular store so you can see the difference in gauge.
My takeaway:
- If you need heavy-duty pans for very weighty dishes, these aren’t a perfect one-for-one replacement for thicker, premium options. However, for routine baking, storage, and serving—especially when you plan to toss the pan afterward—the cost savings make a lot of sense.
- Doubling them for heavier recipes is a simple workaround that maintains stability while still keeping the overall cost lower than buying thicker single-use pans.
Verdict:
- I’ll be purchasing these again for everyday use and bulk meal prep. The value is strong, and the performance is solid when you match the pan to the job or double up as needed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 15, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Easy clean up
Sturdy. Various uses.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 7, 2026
★★★★★ 5
pans
good
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 31, 2026
★★★★★ 2
Terrible!!
VERY lightweight and flimsy. I wouldn't trust these pans with anything! Oh... they might be okay for serving potato chips or popcorn.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 24, 2026